Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Holy Communion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holy Communion. Show all posts

Friday, September 26, 2014

When the Eucharist Excluded No One


Pope Francis continues to inspire people with his down-to-earth approach of 'feeding the sheep and tending the lambs'.His emphasis on mercy rather than on doctrines and rites is turning the Church upside down. Who couldn't forget how he washed the feet of 12 prisoners - male and female, Catholic and non-Catholic - in a youth prison during the first year of his pontificate? Who wouldn't take to heart his now famous quote "Who am I to judge?", when asked about his views on homosexuals? And who wouldn't recall his reaching out to victims of clerical sexual abuse and other evils? 

Way back in February of this year, the Holy Father invited Cardinal Walter Kasper, President Emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, to speak before the College of Cardinals. In his address, Cardinal Kasper put forward the idea of allowing divorced or civilly remarried (without annulment of their first marriage) Catholics to receive Holy Communion. According to Church teaching, Catholics who remarry without having their first marriage annulled may not receive Holy Communion unless they abstain from sexual relations.

Going fast forward, this 5th of October the Extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family will be convened. It hasn't opened yet, but a handful of Cardinal Kasper's confreres have been criticizing his idea, to the point of publishing books reasserting Church teaching. Word has it that the Pope got irritated with this.  

I read with interest Fr Peter Day's blog entitled "The Eucharist is not a prize for the perfect, Cardinal Pell" (http://www.thetablet.co.uk/blogs/1/439/the-eucharist-is-not-a-prize-for-the-perfect-cardinal-pell). In his blog he put to task Cardinal George Pell, former Archbishop of Sydney and now Prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy, for being a hardliner.  What I find striking was when he asked this prince of the Church - his fellow Australian- what was in the mind of Jesus when He instituted the Eucharist; whose hunger it was that our Lord was responding to (in giving His body and blood as food and drink); and the need to be compelled to reach out to outsiders (in this case, those who are banned from receiving Communion because they remarried without seeking annulment of their first failed marriage). Fr Day wrote "Cardinal, can any of us look our Lord and Master in the eye and say: “Yes, I am a follower; but you must understand there are rules …”?"

It is lamentable to think that there are pari-seos (priests with Pharisaic mindset; I coined this name from the word pariseo or Pharisee, but hyphenated it to stress the word pari or priest) in the Church, the Church founded by Christ who criticized the Pharisees of His time. Pari-seos who would go by the book, whose one-track mind disregards the pleas of those who suffer, whose rigidity prevents fresh air and light from entering the Church.  

I believe in the indissolubility of marriage, but I am also aware that some marriages do fail. To exclude people in this sad situation from receiving Jesus in Holy Communion isn't healthy, isn't Christian at all! Don't get me wrong: I am not condoning couples cohabiting without the blessing of marriage. I do realize though that this situation does happen for various reasons. To close the doors on these brothers and sisters of ours would potentially make them no longer go to church or if they do, they wouldn't care what others say and just receive Communion. Either of these will not be good examples for children, isn't it? To close the doors on these people is to effectively push them to live in sin!

Christ is asking for mercy not sacrifice (Mt 9:13). And that "the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath" (Mk 2:27). Unless our Church leaders move out of their comfort zones, our Church will just be a hollow institution of rules and rituals, a mausoleum in the making.  Only recently, Pope Francis presided over the wedding of 20 couples at St Peter's - with one bride already a mother, some couples had been living together, and other had previous marriages. If we take this as Papa Francesco's hints on how he would like to reintegrate individuals (and families) from failed marriages, then this is something to be welcomed. I hope his brother bishops, especially the likes of Cardinal Pell, would see eye-to-eye with him. The extraordinary synod next month is an opportunity for the Pope, bishops, and other stakeholders to transform the image of the Church into a vibrant community of believers where everyone is welcome, just as Jesus would have wanted it.

This coming Sunday, let's join the rest of the Church across the world in praying for the synod by saying this prayer written by Pope Francis:

Jesus, Mary and Joseph,
in you we contemplate
the splendour of true love,
to you we turn with trust.

Holy Family of Nazareth,
grant that our families too
may be places of communion and prayer,
authentic schools of the Gospel
and small domestic Churches.

Holy Family of Nazareth,
may families never again 
experience violence, rejection and division:
may all who have been hurt or scandalized
find ready comfort and healing.

Holy Family of Nazareth,
may the approaching Synod of Bishops
make us once more mindful 
of the sacredness and inviolability of the family,
and its beauty in God’s plan.

Jesus, Mary and Joseph,
graciously hear our prayer.

Amen.



Friday, December 02, 2011

What Roof?


“Lord, I am not worthy that you should come under my roof; speak but the word and my soul shall be healed”, said the commentator in one Sunday Mass in Gagalangin, Tondo. This happened many, many years ago and I told myself how come this commentator used rather old words rather than what was the usual response. (This commentator is notorious for resorting to ad lib not only in reading out the announcements, but in the responses at Mass.) Twenty-five years later, much to my chagrin, similar words would be used in the new English translation of the Mass: “Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof, but only say the word and my soul shall be healed.”

This is one of the changes that I find myself unable to proclaim. If I were a Mass commentator in the UK (I’m glad there’s none!), I might not control myself to laugh or at least grin at these words.
The Gospel reading for last Monday (Matthew 8:5-11) is the source of prayer before the distribution of Holy Communion. A prayer inspired by the faith of the Roman centurion (a pagan) in Jesus’ power to heal the centurion’s slave.

Sadly, the translation principles followed by the new edition of the Roman Missal has made the prayer sound fundamentalist and limiting. Some critics of the new translation asked what ‘roof’ was being referred to. Was it the roof of the mouth? I can’t blame them for this because, if you come to think of it, the prayer is said before we receive the Body of Christ through our mouths. Surely there is a better way to translate the centurion’s word without making it sound ridiculous.

I can’t imagine how our kababayans at home would feel about saying this at Mass. We could ask those in the Archdiocese of Lingayen-Dagupan (Pangasinan) – they have already introduced the people’s responses since Lent of this year. (No idea why the rush when the CBCP agreed to implement the change in Advent 2012.) Furthermore, I couldn’t think how the Filipino translation would sound like, in case the current translation requires an overhaul.

Apart from the word ‘roof’ another word catches our attention: ‘soul’. I know that it’s the soul that would enjoy the reward or suffer the punishment in the afterlife. But mind you, the Lord came healing all sorts of diseases, not just those that afflict the body such as leprosy or fever, but the soul as well such as driving away demons, etc. With this new change, it’s as though Jesus was only after the good of our souls. I’m not saying that the soul is less important than the body. The soul has to be taken care of as much as we would need to look after the body. And we need Christ’s healing on both (if needed) which is why, I think, the translators of the 1973 edition opted for “I” rather than “my soul”. Didn’t St Irenaeus once said “The glory of God is a human being fully alive…”?

Lord, humbly we admit that we are unworthy to receive You. And yet, You come to us, offering Your Body and Blood as our food and drink. Touch us by Your healing love, cleanse us by Your precious Blood, nourish us by Your sacred Body. In our physical, emotional, psychological weaknesses, in our deepest yearnings, in our sins, we affirm our faith in You: only say the word and we shall be healed. Amen.

  ©Shiny by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP